Jonathan Tan wrote:

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:26:58 -0500
Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I agree that it shouldn't matter much here. But if the name argv_array
is standing in the way of using it, I think we should consider giving it
a more general name. I picked that not to evoke "this must be arguments"
but "this is terminated by a single NULL".

[...]

This sounds reasonable - I withdraw my comment about using struct
string_list.

Marking with #leftoverbits as a reminder to think about what such a
more general name would be (or what kind of docs to put in
argv-array.h) and make it so the next time I do a search for that
keyword.

Thanks,
Jonathan