Thread (329 messages) 329 messages, 12 authors, 2018-03-14

Re: [PATCH v3 28/35] transport-helper: introduce stateless-connect

From: Jonathan Tan <hidden>
Date: 2018-02-22 00:01:25

On Tue,  6 Feb 2018 17:13:05 -0800
Brandon Williams [off-list ref] wrote:
Introduce the transport-helper capability 'stateless-connect'.  This
capability indicates that the transport-helper can be requested to run
the 'stateless-connect' command which should attempt to make a
stateless connection with a remote end.  Once established, the
connection can be used by the git client to communicate with
the remote end natively in a stateless-rpc manner as supported by
protocol v2.  This means that the client must send everything the server
needs in a single request as the client must not assume any
state-storing on the part of the server or transport.
Maybe it's worth mentioning that support in the actual remote helpers
will be added in a subsequent patch.
If a stateless connection cannot be established then the remote-helper
will respond in the same manner as the 'connect' command indicating that
the client should fallback to using the dumb remote-helper commands.
This makes sense, but there doesn't seem to be any code in this patch
that implements this.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -612,6 +615,11 @@ static int process_connect_service(struct transport *transport,
 	if (data->connect) {
 		strbuf_addf(&cmdbuf, "connect %s\n", name);
 		ret = run_connect(transport, &cmdbuf);
+	} else if (data->stateless_connect) {
+		strbuf_addf(&cmdbuf, "stateless-connect %s\n", name);
+		ret = run_connect(transport, &cmdbuf);
+		if (ret)
+			transport->stateless_rpc = 1;
Why is process_connect_service() falling back to stateless_connect if
connect doesn't work? I don't think this fallback would work, as a
client that needs "connect" might need its full capabilities.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help