Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/13] net: dsa: realtek: rtl8365mb: use DSA CPU port
From: Alvin Šipraga <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-19 23:19:08
On 12/19/21 23:19, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 05:14:23AM -0300, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote:quoted
Instead of a fixed CPU port, assume that DSA is correct. Tested-by: Arınç ÜNAL <redacted> Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com> ---I don't necessarily see the value added by this change. Since (I think) only a single port can be a CPU port, a sanity check seems to be missing that the CPU port in the device tree is the expected one. This seems to be missing with or without your patch. You are unnaturally splitting the initialization of a data structure between rtl8365mb_setup() and rtl8365mb_detect(). Maybe what you should do is keep everything in rtl8365mb_detect() where it is right now, and check in rtl8365mb_setup that the cpu_dp->index is equal to priv->cpu_port?
I'm quite sure the switch family does actually support multiple CPU ports. If you have a cascaded switch, CPU-tagged frames may pass between the external ports of the switches. Any port can be configured to parse CPU-tagged frames. And the CPU port configuration register allows for a mask of EXT ports to be configured for trapping. However, this change requires a more thorough explanation of what it is trying to achieve. I already see that Vladimir is confused. The control flow also looks rather strange. If I am to guess what deficiency you are trying to address, it's that the driver assumes that the CPU port is the EXT port; since there is only one possible EXT port, this is hardcoded with RTL8365MB_CPU_PORT_NUM_8365MB_VC = 6. But now your new switch actually has _two_ EXT ports. Which of those is the CPU port is configured by setting the realtek,ext-int property in the device tree node of the CPU port. But that means that the CPU port cannot be hardcoded. So you want to get this information from DSA instead. Similar to my comment to another patch in your series, I think it's worth making the driver support multiple EXT interfaces. Then it should be clearer in the series why you are making these changes. Please consider also Vladimir's point about unnaturally splitting code. I can see it elsewhere in the series a little bit too. It is nice to keep the structure of the driver consistent - at least while it is still young and innocent. :-)
quoted
drivers/net/dsa/realtek/rtl8365mb.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/realtek/rtl8365mb.c b/drivers/net/dsa/realtek/rtl8365mb.c index a8f44538a87a..b79a4639b283 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/realtek/rtl8365mb.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/realtek/rtl8365mb.c@@ -103,14 +103,13 @@ /* Chip-specific data and limits */ #define RTL8365MB_CHIP_ID_8365MB_VC 0x6367 -#define RTL8365MB_CPU_PORT_NUM_8365MB_VC 6 #define RTL8365MB_LEARN_LIMIT_MAX_8365MB_VC 2112 /* Family-specific data and limits */ #define RTL8365MB_PHYADDRMAX 7 #define RTL8365MB_NUM_PHYREGS 32 #define RTL8365MB_PHYREGMAX (RTL8365MB_NUM_PHYREGS - 1) -#define RTL8365MB_MAX_NUM_PORTS (RTL8365MB_CPU_PORT_NUM_8365MB_VC + 1) +#define RTL8365MB_MAX_NUM_PORTS 7 /* Chip identification registers */ #define RTL8365MB_CHIP_ID_REG 0x1300@@ -1827,9 +1826,18 @@ static int rtl8365mb_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds) dev_info(priv->dev, "no interrupt support\n"); /* Configure CPU tagging */ - ret = rtl8365mb_cpu_config(priv); - if (ret) - goto out_teardown_irq; + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_ports; i++) { + if (!(dsa_is_cpu_port(priv->ds, i))) + continue;dsa_switch_for_each_cpu_port(cpu_dp, ds)quoted
+ priv->cpu_port = i; + mb->cpu.mask = BIT(priv->cpu_port); + mb->cpu.trap_port = priv->cpu_port; + ret = rtl8365mb_cpu_config(priv); + if (ret) + goto out_teardown_irq; + + break; + } /* Configure ports */ for (i = 0; i < priv->num_ports; i++) {@@ -1960,8 +1968,7 @@ static int rtl8365mb_detect(struct realtek_priv *priv) "found an RTL8365MB-VC switch (ver=0x%04x)\n", chip_ver); - priv->cpu_port = RTL8365MB_CPU_PORT_NUM_8365MB_VC; - priv->num_ports = priv->cpu_port + 1; + priv->num_ports = RTL8365MB_MAX_NUM_PORTS; mb->priv = priv; mb->chip_id = chip_id;@@ -1972,8 +1979,6 @@ static int rtl8365mb_detect(struct realtek_priv *priv) mb->jam_size = ARRAY_SIZE(rtl8365mb_init_jam_8365mb_vc); mb->cpu.enable = 1; - mb->cpu.mask = BIT(priv->cpu_port); - mb->cpu.trap_port = priv->cpu_port; mb->cpu.insert = RTL8365MB_CPU_INSERT_TO_ALL; mb->cpu.position = RTL8365MB_CPU_POS_AFTER_SA; mb->cpu.rx_length = RTL8365MB_CPU_RXLEN_64BYTES;-- 2.34.0