Re: [PATCH net-next v6 00/23] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel

Ard Biesheuvel [off-list ref] wrote:

On 28 September 2018 at 07:46, Jason A. Donenfeld [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

If an implementation enters Zinc, it will go through my tree. If it
enters the crypto API, it will go through Herbert's tree. If there
wind up being messy tree dependency and merge timing issues, I can
work this out in the usual way with Herbert. I'll be sure to discuss
these edge cases with him when we discuss. I think there's a way to
handle that with minimum friction.

I would also strongly prefer that all crypto work is taken through
Herbert's tree, so we have a coherent view of it before it goes
upstream.

I agree.  I don't have any problems with the zinc code living in
its own git tree.  But any upstream merges should definitely go
through the crypto tree because the inherent ties between the two
code-base.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt