Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert()
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-24 17:06:46
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-24 17:06:46
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
But if people do seem to have a mixed / confused notion of atomicity and barriers, and if there's consensus, then as I'd said earlier, I have no issues in going with the consensus (eg. having API variants). Linus would be more difficult to convince, however, I suspect :-)
The confusion may be the result of us having barrier semantics in atomic_read. If we take that out then we may avoid future confusions.