Thread (305 messages) 305 messages, 27 authors, 2007-09-11

Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert()

From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-24 17:06:46
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
But if people do seem to have a mixed / confused notion of atomicity
and barriers, and if there's consensus, then as I'd said earlier, I
have no issues in going with the consensus (eg. having API variants).
Linus would be more difficult to convince, however, I suspect :-)
The confusion may be the result of us having barrier semantics in 
atomic_read. If we take that out then we may avoid future confusions.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help