Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures

On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 05:49:50PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:30:23AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:

quoted

Thanks.  But I don't need a summary of the thread, I'm asking
for an extant code snippet in our kernel that benefits from
the volatile change and is not part of a busy-wait.

Sorry, can't help you there.  I really do believe that the information
you need (as opposed to the specific item you are asking for) really
has been put forth in this thread.

That only leads me to believe that such a code snippet simply
does not exist.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt