Thread (305 messages) 305 messages, 27 authors, 2007-09-11

Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures

From: Herbert Xu <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-17 00:02:42
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:48:54PM -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
quoted
Can you find an actual atomic_read code snippet there that is
broken without the volatile modifier?
A whole bunch of atomic_read uses will be broken without the volatile 
modifier once we start removing barriers that aren't needed if volatile 
behavior is guaranteed.
Could you please cite the file/function names so we can
see whether removing the barrier makes sense?

Thanks,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help