Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2007-08-15 15:36:40
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2007-08-15 15:36:40
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 07:25:16AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Do we really need another set of APIs? Can you give even one example where the pre-existing volatile semantics are causing enough of a problem to justify adding yet more atomic_*() APIs?
Let's turn this around. Can you give a single example where the volatile semantics is needed in a legitimate way? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref] Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt