Re: [PATCH 6/6] Input: elantech - add v3 hardware support
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2011-08-18 06:02:43
Also in:
lkml
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2011-08-18 06:02:43
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:15:00PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
On 08/18/2011 11:47 AM, Li Zefan wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
+ + case 3: + if (elantech_ps2_command(psmouse, NULL, ETP_PS2_CUSTOM_COMMAND) || + elantech_ps2_command(psmouse, NULL, ETP_REGISTER_READWRITE) || + elantech_ps2_command(psmouse, NULL, ETP_PS2_CUSTOM_COMMAND) || + elantech_ps2_command(psmouse, NULL, reg) || + elantech_ps2_command(psmouse, param, PSMOUSE_CMD_GETINFO)) { + rc = -1; + }Prefer to remove these big brace ? also with "case 1, case 2 "?Just wondering What's wrong with this piece of code and what do you sugguest to improve it?I think no need to add a '{}' with the *if* ? and remove the '{}' in whole elantech_read_reg() and elantech_write_reg(), right?
In case when conditon "overpowers" the body (i.e. multi-line condition) I prefer having braces so the body stands out. Thanks. -- Dmitry