Thread (180 messages) 180 messages, 16 authors, 2020-06-23

Re: Should SEV-ES #VC use IST? (Re: [PATCH] Allow RDTSC and RDTSCP from userspace)

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-06-23 15:39:16
Also in: kvm, lkml

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:23:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:59:14PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:53:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
+noinstr void idtentry_validate_ist(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	if ((regs->sp & ~(EXCEPTION_STKSZ-1)) ==
+	    (_RET_IP_ & ~(EXCEPTION_STKSZ-1)))
+		die("IST stack recursion", regs, 0);
+}
Yes, this is a start, it doesn't cover the case where the NMI stack is
in-between, so I think you need to walk down regs->sp too.
That shouldn't be possible with the current code, I think.
To clarify, we have: NMI, MCE, DB and DF.

DF (with the exception of ESPFIX) is fatal.
MCE from kernel is fatal (which is what makes the MCE in NMI 'work')
NMI and DB clear DR7, which avoids DB in NMI.

So that leaves: NMI in DB, and that works.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help