On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:13:03AM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:

From: Joerg Roedel <redacted>

Factor out the code to fetch the instruction from user-space to a helper
function.

Add "No functional changes." here.

Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <redacted>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/insn-eval.h |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/umip.c           | 26 +++++-----------------
 arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c         | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

...

+int insn_fetch_from_user(struct pt_regs *regs,
+			 unsigned char buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE])

No need for that linebreak - fits in 80 cols.

+{
+	unsigned long seg_base = 0;
+	int not_copied;
+
+	/*
+	 * If not in user-space long mode, a custom code segment could be in
+	 * use. This is true in protected mode (if the process defined a local
+	 * descriptor table), or virtual-8086 mode. In most of the cases
+	 * seg_base will be zero as in USER_CS.
+	 */
+	if (!user_64bit_mode(regs))
+		seg_base = insn_get_seg_base(regs, INAT_SEG_REG_CS);
+
+	if (seg_base == -1L)
+		return 0;

This reads strange: seg_base is changed only inside that if test so I
guess we could test it there too:

        if (!user_64bit_mode(regs)) {
                seg_base = insn_get_seg_base(regs, INAT_SEG_REG_CS);
                if (seg_base == -1L)
                        return 0;
        }

which is a small enough change to not require a separate patch.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette