Thread (180 messages) 180 messages, 16 authors, 2020-06-23

Re: [PATCH 70/70] x86/sev-es: Add NMI state tracking

From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Date: 2020-03-20 19:48:54
Also in: kvm, lkml

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 02:27:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
AIUI the shift-ist stuff is because we aren't very good about the way
that we handle tracing right now, and that can cause a limited degree
of recursion.  #DB uses IST for historical reasons that don't
necessarily make sense.  Right now, we need it for only one reason:
the MOV SS issue.  IIRC this isn't actually triggerable without
debugging enabled -- MOV SS with no breakpoint but TF on doesn't seem
to malfunction quite as badly.
I had a look at the shift_ist stuff today and it looks like a good
solution to the #VC nesting problem when it is turned into a #VC
handler. The devil is in the details, of course, as 3 or 4 stacks for
the #VC handler (per cpu) should only be allocated when actually running
in an SEV-ES guest. Let's see how this works out in practice.

Regards,

	Joerg
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help