Thread (180 messages) 180 messages, 16 authors, 2020-06-23

Re: Should SEV-ES #VC use IST? (Re: [PATCH] Allow RDTSC and RDTSCP from userspace)

From: Andrew Cooper <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-23 13:57:28
Also in: kvm, lkml

On 23/06/2020 13:47, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
quoted
There are cases which are definitely non-recoverable.

For both ES and SNP, a malicious hypervisor can mess with the guest
physmap to make the the NMI, #VC and #DF stacks all alias.

For ES, this had better result in the #DF handler deciding that crashing
is the way out, whereas for SNP, this had better escalate to Shutdown.
Crashing out hard if the hypervisor is misbehaving is acceptable.
Then I'm thinking the only sensible option is to crash hard for any SNP
#VC from kernel mode.

Sadly that doesn't help with #VC needing to be IST :-( IST is such a
frigging nightmare.
I presume you mean any #VC caused by RMP faults (i.e. something went
wrong with the memory owner/etc metadata) ?

If so, then yes.  Any failure here is a bug in the kernel or hypervisor
(and needs fixing) or a malicious hypervisor and the guest should
terminate for its own safety.

~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help