Re: Should SEV-ES #VC use IST? (Re: [PATCH] Allow RDTSC and RDTSCP from userspace)
From: Andrew Cooper <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-23 13:57:28
Also in:
kvm, lkml
From: Andrew Cooper <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-23 13:57:28
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On 23/06/2020 13:47, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:quoted
There are cases which are definitely non-recoverable. For both ES and SNP, a malicious hypervisor can mess with the guest physmap to make the the NMI, #VC and #DF stacks all alias. For ES, this had better result in the #DF handler deciding that crashing is the way out, whereas for SNP, this had better escalate to Shutdown. Crashing out hard if the hypervisor is misbehaving is acceptable.Then I'm thinking the only sensible option is to crash hard for any SNP #VC from kernel mode. Sadly that doesn't help with #VC needing to be IST :-( IST is such a frigging nightmare.
I presume you mean any #VC caused by RMP faults (i.e. something went wrong with the memory owner/etc metadata) ? If so, then yes. Any failure here is a bug in the kernel or hypervisor (and needs fixing) or a malicious hypervisor and the guest should terminate for its own safety. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization