Re: Should SEV-ES #VC use IST? (Re: [PATCH] Allow RDTSC and RDTSCP from userspace)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-06-23 15:23:56
Also in:
kvm, lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2020-06-23 15:23:56
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:59:14PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:53:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
+noinstr void idtentry_validate_ist(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + if ((regs->sp & ~(EXCEPTION_STKSZ-1)) == + (_RET_IP_ & ~(EXCEPTION_STKSZ-1))) + die("IST stack recursion", regs, 0); +}Yes, this is a start, it doesn't cover the case where the NMI stack is in-between, so I think you need to walk down regs->sp too.
That shouldn't be possible with the current code, I think.
The dumpstack code already has some logic for this.
Reliability of that depends on the unwinder, I wouldn't want the guess uwinder to OOPS me by accident.