On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 08:41:39PM +0000, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 7:25 PM Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ clock-names:
+ items:
+ - const: stmmaceth
+ - const: pclk
+ - const: ptp_ref
+ - const: tx
+ - const: rx
+ - const: tx-180
+ - const: rx-180
As Russell said in an older thread, tx and tx-180 are effectively the
same clock, but with an inverter added. You should be able to arrange
the clock tree that if you enable tx, it also enables tx-180 as a
parent/sibling relationship.
I can certainly do that, but not sure in the DT we will be describing
the HW correctly then. I'll have to hide *-180 clocks In the DT and
handle and turning on/off these clocks in the clock driver.
...
clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xbd>,
<&cpg CPG_MOD 0xbc>,
<&cpg CPG_CORE R9A09G057_GBETH_0_CLK_PTP_REF_I>,
<&cpg CPG_MOD 0xb8>,
<&cpg CPG_MOD 0xb9>,
<&cpg CPG_MOD 0xba>,
<&cpg CPG_MOD 0xbb>;
Your SoC designer really implemented the 0° and 180° as two separate
independently controllable clocks?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!