Jason,

On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:30 AM Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

+++ b/lib/zinc/chacha20/chacha20-x86_64-glue.h

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

Please put that into a separate one liner comment. Also this should be
'GPL-2.0[+] or MIT' I think.

I had that originally, but changed it to just MIT, since MIT is a
subset of GPL-2.0. And looking at tree repo, it appears this is what
others do too.

Subset? Not really. Both MIT and BSD3-Clause are GPL2.0 compatible
licenses. And if your intention is to have those files MIT/BSD only, yes
then the single license identifier is the right thing. If you want it dual
licensed then it should be expressed there clearly.

Thanks,

	tglx