Thread (161 messages) 161 messages, 13 authors, 2013-11-21

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: introduce gro_frag_list_enable sysctl

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2013-10-30 04:16:19

On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 12:08 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:06:52PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
I am not sure 64K GRO packets that must be segmented are going to be
faster than 22K packets without segmentation at all (TSO path on xmit)
Indeed that is a tough call, but I think conceptually the 64K
case is much nicer than a sysctl that gets magically turned off.
The thing is this only matters for hosts receiving at line rate on few
TCP flows.

A router should not build too big GRO packets, as it adds latencies.

Really, we had to make TSO packets being auto sized, lets not add the
syndrome again.

So I do not really understand David concern about emitting a warning.

If a machine is used as a router, building GRO packets of 17 MSS is
absolutely fine.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help