Thread (161 messages) 161 messages, 13 authors, 2013-11-21

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: introduce gro_frag_list_enable sysctl

From: Jerry Chu <hidden>
Date: 2013-10-30 04:15:53

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Herbert Xu [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:08:18PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:06:52PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
I am not sure 64K GRO packets that must be segmented are going to be
faster than 22K packets without segmentation at all (TSO path on xmit)
Indeed that is a tough call, but I think conceptually the 64K
case is much nicer than a sysctl that gets magically turned off.
Also at some point we'll want to do >64K GRO/GSO too so we'll
have to face this complexity one day.
Not sure how this is possible with the IP datagram length limit. (Am I
missing something, like pkt chaining?)

Jerry
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help