Re: char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions

On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 19:48 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

quoted

For 1/4 and 2/4: explain why the message can be omitted.

quoted

That's all.

I assume that there might be also some communication challenges
involved.

quoted

3/4: definitive NAK, too much noise compared to value.

I tried to reduce deviations from the Linux coding style again.
You do not like such an attempt for this software area so far.

The problem here in a time line or what comes first. Definitely, you are
trying to fix the code which _is_ upstream vs. the code which _might be_
upstream (exception is drivers/staging).

Why didn't you listen to what people are telling you?

Why are you spending too much time on little sense crap instead of doing
real fixes?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref]
Intel Finland Oy