RE: char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations
From: <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-18 09:50:50
Also in:
kernel-janitors, linux-integrity, lkml
From: <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-18 09:50:50
Also in:
kernel-janitors, linux-integrity, lkml
On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 11:00 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:quoted
quoted
The printk removals do change the objects. The value of that type of change is only for resource limited systems=
.
quoted
I imagine that such small code adjustments are also useful for othersystems. =20 Your imagination and mine differ. Where do you _think_ it matters? =20 For instance, nothing about =20 sizeof(type) vs sizeof(*ptr) =20 makes it easier for a human to read the code.
If it does not make it easier to read the code for you, then maybe you shou= ld consider that this might not be true for all humans. For me, it makes it= much easier to see at a glance, that code like ptr=3Dmalloc(sizeof(*ptr)) = is correct. Alexander