Thread (88 messages) 88 messages, 13 authors, 2017-10-23

Re: char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-18 17:22:19
Also in: kernel-janitors, linux-integrity, lkml

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 08:18:58PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 06:43:10PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
quoted
quoted
Commit message should just describe in plain text what you are doing
Did other contributors find the wording “Replace …”

quoted
and why.
and “… a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.”
sufficient often enough already?

Which description would you find more appropriate for this change pattern?

Regards,
Markus
For 1/4 and 2/4: explain why the message can be omitted. Remove sentence
about Coccinelle. That's all.
3/4: definitive NAK, too much noise compared to value.
4/4: this a good commit message. Requires a Tested-by before can be
accepted, which I'm not able to give.

Hope this helps.

/Jarkko
One more word of advice: send the three as separate patches. My guess is
that it takes a factor longer time to apply 4/4 than other patches
because there's more limited crowd who can test it.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help