Re: char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-18 17:22:19
Also in:
kernel-janitors, linux-integrity, lkml
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-18 17:22:19
Also in:
kernel-janitors, linux-integrity, lkml
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 08:18:58PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 06:43:10PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:quoted
quoted
Commit message should just describe in plain text what you are doingDid other contributors find the wording “Replace …”quoted
and why.and “… a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.” sufficient often enough already? Which description would you find more appropriate for this change pattern? Regards, MarkusFor 1/4 and 2/4: explain why the message can be omitted. Remove sentence about Coccinelle. That's all. 3/4: definitive NAK, too much noise compared to value. 4/4: this a good commit message. Requires a Tested-by before can be accepted, which I'm not able to give. Hope this helps. /Jarkko
One more word of advice: send the three as separate patches. My guess is that it takes a factor longer time to apply 4/4 than other patches because there's more limited crowd who can test it.