Re: [PATCH 3/4] char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-18 14:52:55
Also in:
kernel-janitors, linux-integrity, lkml
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-18 14:52:55
Also in:
kernel-janitors, linux-integrity, lkml
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:02:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 08:52 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 11:50 +0000, Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
Replace the specification of data structures by pointer dereferences as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.This patch does one style in favor of the other.I actually prefer that style, so I'd welcome this change :)Style changes should be reviewed and documented, like any other code change, and added to Documentation/process/coding-style.rst or an equivalent file.+1.quoted
quoted
quoted
At the end it's Jarkko's call, though I would NAK this as I think some one already told this to you for some other similar patch(es). I even would suggest to stop doing this noisy stuff, which keeps people busy for nothing.Cleaning up old code is also worth something, even if does not change one bit in the assembly output in the end...Wow, you're opening the door really wide for all sorts of trivial changes! Hope you have the time and inclination to review and comment on all of them. I certainly don't.Moreover and not so obvious is an open door for making back port of *real* fixes much harder!
Yes. This is really the key observation: A commit must have value above the cost of fixing a merge conflict. /Jarkko