Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
From: Bill Davidsen <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-07 21:45:29
Also in:
lkml
From: Bill Davidsen <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-07 21:45:29
Also in:
lkml
Claudio Martins wrote:
On Saturday 04 August 2007, Alan Cox wrote:quoted
Linux has never been a "suprise your kernel interfaces all just changed today" kernel, nor a "gosh you upgraded and didn't notice your backups broke" kernel.Can you give examples of backup solutions that rely on atime being updated? I can understand backup tools using mtime/ctime for incremental backups (like tar + Amanda, etc), but I'm having trouble figuring out why someone would want to use atime for that.
Programs which migrate unused files or delete them are the usual cases. -- Bill Davidsen [off-list ref] "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>