Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
From: Arjan van de Ven <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-05 18:04:33
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 16:17 +0200, JA?rn Engel wrote:
On Sun, 5 August 2007 10:53:54 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:quoted
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 09:21:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:quoted
btw., Mutt does not go boom, i use it myself. It works just fine and notices new mails even on a noatime,nodiratime filesystem.IIRC, atime is used by mailers and by the shell to detect that new mail has arrived and report it only once if there are several intances watching the same mbox. I too use mutt and noatime,nodiratime everywhere (same 10 year-old thinko), and the only side effect is that when I have a new mail, it is reported in all of my xterms until I read it, clearly something I can live with (and sometimes it's even desirable). In fact, mutt is pretty good at this. It updates atime and ctime itself as soon as it opens the mbox, so the shell is happy and only reports "you have mail" afterwards.For me mutt fails to recognize new mail. And the difference might be this:
but does it work with relatime ? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>