Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-05 07:18:37
Also in:
lkml
* Alan Cox [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Linux has always been a "POSIX unless its stupid" type of system. For the upstream kernel, we should do the right thing -- noatime by default -- but allow distros and people that care about rigid compliance to easily change the default.Linux has never been a "suprise your kernel interfaces all just changed today" kernel, nor a "gosh you upgraded and didn't notice your backups broke" kernel.
HSM uses atime as a _hint_. The only even remotely valid argument is Mutt, and even that one could easily be fixed _it is not even installed by default on most distros_ and nobody but me uses it ;) [and i've been using Mutt on noatime filesystems for years] So basically a single type of package and use-case (against tens of thousands of packages) held all of Linux desktop IO performance hostage for 10 years, to the tune of a 20-30-50-100% performance degradation (depending on the workload)? Wow. And the atime situation is _so_ obvious, what will we do in the much less obvious cases? Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>