Re: [patch] implement smarter atime updates support
From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-05 20:05:33
Also in:
lkml
From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-05 20:05:33
Also in:
lkml
O> you might want to add
/* * if the inode is dirty already, do the atime update since * we'll be doing the disk IO anyway to clean the inode. */ if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) return 1;
This makes the actual result somewhat less predictable. Is that wise ? Right now its clear what happens based on what user sequence of events and that this is easily repeatable. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>