Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-04 19:22:17
Also in:
lkml
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-04 19:22:17
Also in:
lkml
* Jorn Engel [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I actually vote for that. IMO, distros should turn -on- atime updates when they know its needed.If you mean "relatime" I concur. "noatime" hurts mutt and others while "relatime" has no known problems, afaics.
so ... one app can keep 30,000+ apps hostage? i use Mutt myself, on such a filesystem: /dev/md0 on / type ext3 (rw,noatime,nodiratime,user_xattr) and i can see no problems, it notices new mails just fine. Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>