Re: [PATCH v2 20/23] arm64: dts: mt8192: Add display nodes
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Date: 2022-02-22 10:24:43
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml
Hi, On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 5:16 PM Allen-KH Cheng [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add display nodes for mt8192 SoC. Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <redacted> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi index e3314cdc7c1a..026f2d8141b0 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi@@ -32,6 +32,11 @@ i2c7 = &i2c7; i2c8 = &i2c8; i2c9 = &i2c9; + ovl0 = &ovl0; + ovl-2l0 = &ovl_2l0; + ovl-2l2 = &ovl_2l2; + rdma0 = &rdma0; + rdma4 = &rdma4; }; clk26m: oscillator0 {@@ -1224,6 +1229,13 @@ #clock-cells = <1>; }; + mutex: mutex@14001000 { + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-disp-mutex"; + reg = <0 0x14001000 0 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 252 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; + clocks = <&mmsys CLK_MM_DISP_MUTEX0>; + }; + smi_common: smi@14002000 { compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-smi-common"; reg = <0 0x14002000 0 0x1000>;@@ -1255,6 +1267,109 @@ power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_DISP>; }; + ovl0: ovl@14005000 { + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-disp-ovl"; + reg = <0 0x14005000 0 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 254 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; + clocks = <&mmsys CLK_MM_DISP_OVL0>; + iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L0_OVL_RDMA0>, + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L0_OVL_RDMA0_HDR>; + power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_DISP>; + }; + + ovl_2l0: ovl@14006000 { + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-disp-ovl-2l"; + reg = <0 0x14006000 0 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 255 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; + power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_DISP>; + clocks = <&mmsys CLK_MM_DISP_OVL0_2L>; + iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L1_OVL_2L_RDMA0>, + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L1_OVL_2L_RDMA0_HDR>; + }; + + rdma0: rdma@14007000 { + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-disp-rdma"; + reg = <0 0x14007000 0 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 256 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; + clocks = <&mmsys CLK_MM_DISP_RDMA0>; + iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L0_DISP_RDMA0>; + mediatek,larb = <&larb0>; + mediatek,rdma-fifo-size = <5120>; + power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_DISP>; + }; + + color0: color@14009000 { + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-disp-color", + "mediatek,mt8173-disp-color"; + reg = <0 0x14009000 0 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 258 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; + power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_DISP>; + clocks = <&mmsys CLK_MM_DISP_COLOR0>; + }; + + ccorr0: ccorr@1400a000 { + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-disp-ccorr"; + reg = <0 0x1400a000 0 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 259 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; + power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_DISP>; + clocks = <&mmsys CLK_MM_DISP_CCORR0>; + }; + + aal0: aal@1400b000 { + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-disp-aal";
git.kernel.org/chunkuang.hu/c/4ed545e7d10049b5492afc184e61a67e478a2cfd suggests that there should be a fallback compatible? Otherwise this doesn't probe. ChenYu _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel