On 23/02/12 19:38, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On 02/22/2012 11:50 PM, Ryan Mallon :
quoted
On 22/02/12 20:39, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
quoted
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <redacted>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Mallon <redacted>
---
<snip>
quoted
- seq_printf(s, "SCSR = %8x\n", scsr = at91_sys_read(AT91_PMC_SCSR));
- seq_printf(s, "PCSR = %8x\n", pcsr = at91_sys_read(AT91_PMC_PCSR));
- seq_printf(s, "MOR = %8x\n", at91_sys_read(AT91_CKGR_MOR));
- seq_printf(s, "MCFR = %8x\n", at91_sys_read(AT91_CKGR_MCFR));
- seq_printf(s, "PLLA = %8x\n", at91_sys_read(AT91_CKGR_PLLAR));
+ seq_printf(s, "SCSR = %8x\n", scsr = at91_pmc_read(AT91_PMC_SCSR));
+ seq_printf(s, "PCSR = %8x\n", pcsr = at91_pmc_read(AT91_PMC_PCSR));
I realise the original code is wrong, so doesn't need to be fixed in
this patch, but can we please move the assignments out of the seq_printf
calls.
Well, I would not say "wrong". But ugly, for sure. I queue a patch to
correct this just before this one.
Sorry, I meant ugly rather than wrong. When I first saw it, I thought your
replace script had made a mistake :-).
~Ryan