[PATCH v2 02/19] ARM: at91/at91x40: remove use of at91_sys_read/write
From: Ryan Mallon <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-22 22:22:45
Also in:
lkml
On 22/02/12 20:39, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <redacted> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <redacted> --- arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40_time.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++----------- arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91x40.h | 18 +++++++++--------- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c index 0154b7f..5400a1d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40.c@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static void at91x40_idle(void) * Disable the processor clock. The processor will be automatically * re-enabled by an interrupt or by a reset. */ - at91_sys_write(AT91_PS_CR, AT91_PS_CR_CPU); + __raw_writel(AT91_PS_CR_CPU, AT91_PS_CR);
This doesn't seem to be equivalent, at91_sys_write does: void __iomem *addr = (void __iomem *)AT91_VA_BASE_SYS; __raw_writel(value, addr + reg_offset); and this patch doesn't redefine AT91_PS_CR. Was it broken before this patch? What am I missing? ~Ryan