Thread (58 messages) flat view 58 messages, 5 authors, 2012-02-23

[PATCH v2 12/19] ARM: at91/rtc-at91sam9: each SoC can select the RTT device to use

From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-22 16:38:05
Also in: lkml

On 14:50 Wed 22 Feb     , Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
quoted
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <redacted>

For the RTT as RTC driver rtc-at91sam9, the platform_device structure
is filled during SoC initialization. This will allow to convert this
RTC driver as a standard platform driver.
Can you make this more elaborate? I don't see from this or the code why
you don't just always register the RTT as "rtc-at91sam9". There seems to
be no driver for the "at91_rtt" in tree, so I don't know if there is
an out of tree driver binding to it.

Would it be possible to remove the compile time #if and the resetting
of the device name if both drivers bind to the rtc name and the other
rtt driver binds to both names?
because I see a quite some people use the rtt for something else

so I don't want to change on existing kernel

Best Regards,
J.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help