RE: [PATCH net-next 10/13] ravb: Factorise ravb_set_features
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Date: 2021-08-28 09:21:07
Also in:
linux-renesas-soc
-----Original Message----- From: Sergey Shtylyov <redacted> Sent: 27 August 2021 20:17 To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>; David S. Miller [off-list ref]; Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] Cc: Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>; Andrew Lunn [off-list ref]; Sergei Shtylyov [off-list ref]; Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref]; Adam Ford [off-list ref]; Yoshihiro Shimoda [off-list ref]; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-renesas- soc@vger.kernel.org; Chris Paterson [off-list ref]; Biju Das [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/13] ravb: Factorise ravb_set_features On 8/25/21 10:01 AM, Biju Das wrote:quoted
RZ/G2L supports HW checksum on RX and TX whereas R-Car supports on RX. Factorise ravb_set_features to support this feature. Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)[...]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.cb/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c index 1f9d9f54bf1b..1789309c4c03 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c@@ -1901,8 +1901,8 @@ static void ravb_set_rx_csum(struct net_device*ndev, bool enable)quoted
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags); } -static int ravb_set_features(struct net_device *ndev, - netdev_features_t features) +static int ravb_set_features_rx_csum(struct net_device *ndev, + netdev_features_t features)How about ravb_set_features_rcar() or s/th alike?
What about ravb_rcar_set_features_csum()? and ravb_rgeth_set_features_csum()? If you are ok with this name change I will incorporate this changes in next - RFC patchset? If you still want ravb_set_features_rcar() and ravb_set_features_rgeth(), I am ok with that as well. Please let me know, which name you like. Regards, Biju
[...] Other than that: Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <redacted> Let's see the TOC code now... MBR, Sergey