Re: [PATCH net-next 04/13] ravb: Add ptp_cfg_active to struct ravb_hw_info
From: Sergey Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-26 10:30:08
Also in:
linux-renesas-soc
On 26.08.2021 9:20, Biju Das wrote: [...]
quoted
quoted
There are some H/W differences for the gPTP feature between R-Car Gen3, R-Car Gen2, and RZ/G2L as below. 1) On R-Car Gen3, gPTP support is active in config mode. 2) On R-Car Gen2, gPTP support is not active in config mode. 3) RZ/G2L does not support the gPTP feature. Add a ptp_cfg_active hw feature bit to struct ravb_hw_info for supporting gPTP active in config mode for R-Car Gen3.Wait, we've just done this ion the previous patch!quoted
This patch also removes enum ravb_chip_id, chip_id from both struct ravb_hw_info and struct ravb_private, as it is unused. Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h | 8 +------- drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 12 +++++------- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.hb/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h index 9ecf1a8c3ca8..209e030935aa 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h@@ -979,17 +979,11 @@ struct ravb_ptp { struct ravb_ptp_perout perout[N_PER_OUT]; }; -enum ravb_chip_id { - RCAR_GEN2, - RCAR_GEN3, -}; - struct ravb_hw_info { const char (*gstrings_stats)[ETH_GSTRING_LEN]; size_t gstrings_size; netdev_features_t net_hw_features; netdev_features_t net_features; - enum ravb_chip_id chip_id; int stats_len; size_t max_rx_len;I would put the above in a spearte patch...
Separate. :-)
quoted
quoted
unsigned aligned_tx: 1;@@ -999,6 +993,7 @@ struct ravb_hw_info { unsigned tx_counters:1; /* E-MAC has TX counters */ unsigned multi_irqs:1; /* AVB-DMAC and E-MAC has multipleirqs */quoted
unsigned no_ptp_cfg_active:1; /* AVB-DMAC does not support gPTPactive in config mode */quoted
+ unsigned ptp_cfg_active:1; /* AVB-DMAC has gPTP support active inconfig mode */ Huh?quoted
}; struct ravb_private {[...]quoted
@@ -2216,7 +2213,7 @@ static int ravb_probe(struct platform_device*pdev)quoted
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->ts_skb_list); /* Initialise PTP Clock driver */ - if (info->chip_id != RCAR_GEN2) + if (info->ptp_cfg_active) ravb_ptp_init(ndev, pdev);What's that? Didn't you touch this lie in patch #3? This seems lie a NAK bait... :-(Please refer the original patch[1] which introduced gPTP support active in config mode. I am sure this will clear all your doubts.
It hasn't. Why do we need 2 bit fields (1 "positive" and 1 "negative") for
the same feature is beyond me.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c?h=next-20210825&id=f5d7837f96e53a8c9b6c49e1bc95cf0ae88b99e8 Regards, Biju
MBR, Sergey