RE: [PATCH net-next 12/18] ravb: Factorise {emac,dmac} init function
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Date: 2021-08-20 19:44:14
Also in:
linux-renesas-soc
Hi Sergei,
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 12/18] ravb: Factorise {emac,dmac} init function On 8/20/21 6:42 PM, Biju Das wrote: [...]quoted
quoted
quoted
The R-Car AVB module has Magic packet detection, multiple irq's and timestamp enable features which is not present on RZ/G2L Gigabit^ areOK. Will fix this in next patch set.quoted
quoted
Ethernet module. Factorise emac and dmac initialization function to support the later SoC. Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h | 2 + drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.hb/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h index d82bfa6e57c1..4d5910dcda86 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h@@ -992,6 +992,8 @@ struct ravb_ops { void (*ring_free)(struct net_device *ndev, int q); void (*ring_format)(struct net_device *ndev, int q); bool (*alloc_rx_desc)(struct net_device *ndev, int q); + void (*emac_init)(struct net_device *ndev); + void (*dmac_init)(struct net_device *ndev); }; struct ravb_drv_data {diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.cb/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c index 3d0f6598b936..e200114376e4 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static int ravb_ring_init(struct net_device*ndev, int q) } /* E-MAC init function */ -static void ravb_emac_init(struct net_device *ndev) +static void ravb_emac_init_ex(struct net_device *ndev) { /* Receive frame limit set register */ ravb_write(ndev, ndev->mtu + ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN, RFLR); @@ -480,30 +480,19 @@ static void ravb_emac_init(structnet_device *ndev)quoted
ravb_write(ndev, ECSIPR_ICDIP | ECSIPR_MPDIP | ECSIPR_LCHNGIP, ECSIPR); } -/* Device init function for Ethernet AVB */Grr, this comment seems oudated...OK.Just don't move the comment. :-)quoted
quoted
quoted
-static int ravb_dmac_init(struct net_device *ndev) +static void ravb_emac_init(struct net_device *ndev) { struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); const struct ravb_drv_data *info = priv->info; - int error; - /* Set CONFIG mode */ - error = ravb_config(ndev); - if (error) - return error; - - error = ravb_ring_init(ndev, RAVB_BE); - if (error) - return error; - error = ravb_ring_init(ndev, RAVB_NC); - if (error) { - ravb_ring_free(ndev, RAVB_BE); - return error; - } + info->ravb_ops->emac_init(ndev); +}The whole ravb_emac_init() now consists only of a single methodcall?quoted
quoted
Why do we need it at all?OK will assign info->emac_init with ravb_emac_init, so GbEthernet just need to fill emac_init function. I will remove the function"ravb_emac_init_ex". Will the EMAC init methods differ so much as to we should provide 2 separate implementations? [...]quoted
quoted
quoted
+static void ravb_dmac_init_ex(struct net_device *ndev)Please no _ex suffixes -- reminds me of Windoze too much. :-)OK. Will change it to ravb_device_initUgh! Why not leave it named ravb_dmac_init()?
Please see [1] below and also planning to send another 10 small incremental patches, So that it is clear to every one.
quoted
Regards, Bijuquoted
quoted
+{ + struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + const struct ravb_drv_data *info = priv->info; /* Set AVB RX */ ravb_write(ndev,@@ -530,6 +519,33 @@ static int ravb_dmac_init(struct net_device*ndev)quoted
quoted
quoted
ravb_write(ndev, RIC2_QFE0 | RIC2_QFE1 | RIC2_RFFE, RIC2); /* Frame transmitted, timestamp FIFO updated */ ravb_write(ndev, TIC_FTE0 | TIC_FTE1 | TIC_TFUE, TIC); +} + +static int ravb_dmac_init(struct net_device *ndev) { + struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + const struct ravb_drv_data *info = priv->info; + int error; + + /* Set CONFIG mode */ + error = ravb_config(ndev); + if (error) + return error; + + error = ravb_ring_init(ndev, RAVB_BE); + if (error) + return error; + error = ravb_ring_init(ndev, RAVB_NC); + if (error) { + ravb_ring_free(ndev, RAVB_BE); + return error; + } + + /* Descriptor format */ + ravb_ring_format(ndev, RAVB_BE); + ravb_ring_format(ndev, RAVB_NC); + + info->ravb_ops->dmac_init(ndev); /* Setting the control will start the AVB-DMAC process. */ ravb_modify(ndev, CCC, CCC_OPC, CCC_OPC_OPERATION); @@ -2018,6 +2034,8 @@ static const struct ravb_ops ravb_gen3_ops = { .ring_free = ravb_ring_free_rx, .ring_format = ravb_ring_format_rx, .alloc_rx_desc = ravb_alloc_rx_desc, + .emac_init = ravb_emac_init_ex, + .dmac_init = ravb_dmac_init_ex,Hmm, why not also gen2?!The question remained unreplied?... :-/
ravb_ops for gen3 and gen2 same. But RZ/G2L have different function pointers[1]. As agreed on next patchset, we are avoiding indirection and it will be hw_ifo. In that case there will be 1 entry in gen3 and 1 entry in gen2. Hope this clears Your doubts. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20210722141351.13668-18-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com/ Cheers, Biju