RE: [PATCH net-next 05/18] ravb: Replace chip type with a structure for driver data
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Date: 2021-07-23 06:08:23
Also in:
linux-renesas-soc
Hi Sergei, Thanks for the feedback.
Biju Das [off-list ref]; Prabhakar Mahadev Lad [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/18] ravb: Replace chip type with a structure for driver data Hello! On 7/22/21 5:13 PM, Biju Das wrote:quoted
The DMAC and EMAC blocks of Gigabit Ethernet IP is almost similar to Ethernet AVB. With few changes in driver we can support both the IP. This patch is in preparation for supporting the same by replacing chip type by a structure with values, feature bits and function pointers. Currently only values is added to structure and later patches will add features and function pointers. Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h | 14 +++++ drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.hb/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h index 80e62ca2e3d3..0ed21262f26b 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h@@ -988,6 +988,18 @@ enum ravb_chip_id { RCAR_GEN3, }; +struct ravb_drv_data {I'd rather suggest *struct* ravb_hw_info... This is hardly a driver data, more like hwrdware's one. :-)
OK.
quoted
+ netdev_features_t net_features; + netdev_features_t net_hw_features; + const char (*gstrings_stats)[ETH_GSTRING_LEN]; + size_t gstrings_size; + size_t stats_len; + u32 num_gstat_queue; + size_t skb_sz; + u8 num_tx_desc; + enum ravb_chip_id chip_id;Mhm, I'd expect that chip_id is no longer needed with the feature structs...
Yes,If you see the subsequent 3 patches, chip_id usage is completely removed from ravb_main.c. but it is still required for ravb_ptp.c. Please let me know do you want me take out from there as well. Then as part of [1], I can take out chipid completely. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20210722141351.13668-7-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com/
[...]quoted
@@ -1040,6 +1052,8 @@ struct ravb_private { unsigned txcidm:1; /* TX Clock Internal Delay Mode */ unsigned rgmii_override:1; /* Deprecated rgmii-*id behavior */ int num_tx_desc; /* TX descriptors per packet */ + + const struct ravb_drv_data *info;So data or info? :-)
As we are going to use ravb_hw_info, it will be info.
[...]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.cb/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c index 805397088850..84ebd6fef711 100644--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c[...]quoted
@@ -1176,9 +1179,12 @@ static void ravb_get_ethtool_stats(structnet_device *ndev, static void ravb_get_strings(struct net_device *ndev, u32 stringset, u8 *data) { + struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + const struct ravb_drv_data *info = priv->info; + switch (stringset) { case ETH_SS_STATS: - memcpy(data, ravb_gstrings_stats,sizeof(ravb_gstrings_stats));quoted
+ memcpy(data, info->gstrings_stats, info->gstrings_size); break; } }@@ -1924,12 +1930,36 @@ static int ravb_mdio_release(struct ravb_private*priv)quoted
return 0; } +static const struct ravb_drv_data ravb_gen3_data = { + .net_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM, + .net_hw_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM, + .gstrings_stats = ravb_gstrings_stats, + .gstrings_size = sizeof(ravb_gstrings_stats), + .stats_len = ARRAY_SIZE(ravb_gstrings_stats), + .num_gstat_queue = NUM_RX_QUEUE, + .skb_sz = RX_BUF_SZ + RAVB_ALIGN - 1, + .num_tx_desc = NUM_TX_DESC_GEN3, + .chip_id = RCAR_GEN3, +}; + +static const struct ravb_drv_data ravb_gen2_data = { + .net_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM, + .net_hw_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM,Mhm, why have the fields that don't change from SoC to SoC anyway? I do think they should be added when a new SoC support is added...
This is a preparation patch for supporting RZ/G2L and there is a difference w.r.to RZ/G2L See [2]. That is the reason to isolate the new SoC changes w.r.to existing one it is added Here. Andrew also suggested to make smaller changes. [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20210722141351.13668-18-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com/
quoted
+ .gstrings_stats = ravb_gstrings_stats, + .gstrings_size = sizeof(ravb_gstrings_stats), + .stats_len = ARRAY_SIZE(ravb_gstrings_stats),Same question...
Same as above.
quoted
+ .num_gstat_queue = NUM_RX_QUEUE, + .skb_sz = RX_BUF_SZ + RAVB_ALIGN - 1,Again why?
Same as above.
quoted
+ .num_tx_desc = NUM_TX_DESC_GEN2, + .chip_id = RCAR_GEN2, +}; +[...]quoted
@@ -2052,15 +2082,15 @@ static int ravb_probe(struct platform_device*pdev)quoted
if (!ndev) return -ENOMEM; - ndev->features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM; - ndev->hw_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM; + info = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); + + ndev->features = info->net_features; + ndev->hw_features = info->net_hw_features; pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev); pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev); - chip_id = (enum ravb_chip_id)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); - - if (chip_id == RCAR_GEN3) + if (info->chip_id == RCAR_GEN3)Ugh...
This chip id is replaced in subsequent patch [3] [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20210722141351.13668-8-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com/
quoted
irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "ch22"); else irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);[...]quoted
@@ -2099,7 +2130,7 @@ static int ravb_probe(struct platform_device*pdev)quoted
priv->avb_link_active_low = of_property_read_bool(np, "renesas,ether-link-active-low"); - if (chip_id == RCAR_GEN3) { + if (info->chip_id == RCAR_GEN3) {Ugh...
Same as above.
quoted
irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "ch24"); if (irq < 0) { error = irq;[...]quoted
@@ -2184,7 +2214,7 @@ static int ravb_probe(struct platform_device*pdev)quoted
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->ts_skb_list); /* Initialise PTP Clock driver */ - if (chip_id != RCAR_GEN2) + if (info->chip_id != RCAR_GEN2) ravb_ptp_init(ndev, pdev);Ugh...
Same as above.
quoted
/* Debug message level */@@ -2232,7 +2262,7 @@ static int ravb_probe(struct platform_device*pdev)quoted
priv->desc_bat_dma); /* Stop PTP Clock driver */ - if (chip_id != RCAR_GEN2) + if (info->chip_id != RCAR_GEN2) ravb_ptp_stop(ndev);Ugh...
Same as above. Regards, Biju
quoted
out_disable_refclk: clk_disable_unprepare(priv->refclk);MBR, Sergei