RE: [net-next 11/13] igb: Update PTP function names/variables and locations.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcochran@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:56 PM
To: Vick, Matthew
Cc: Keller, Jacob E; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; davem@davemloft.net;
netdev@vger.kernel.org; gospo@redhat.com; sassmann@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 11/13] igb: Update PTP function names/variables
and locations.

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:44:24PM +0000, Vick, Matthew wrote:

quoted

Isn't this discussion creeping outside the scope of this patch?

Yes, it is. I am suggesting that the driver could use improvement, but
not by renaming functions to suit your or someone else's taste.
Instead, you could work on the time stamping feature.

(And if, along the way, you end up renaming the functions that you
change, then I won't complain ;)

Thanks,
Richard

Looking over the discussions and by trying to reach consensus, I think what I will do is re-spin patch 3 that Jeff sent (Correct PTP support query from ethtool.) to V2 with your feedback and work with Jeff to send all of my patchset up together. This first group of patches is groundwork for the last two. How does this sound?

Cheers,
Matthew