RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet)
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2010-06-17 10:28:43
Le jeudi 17 juin 2010 à 01:56 -0700, Vladislav Zolotarov a écrit :
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Eric Dumazet Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 9:58 PM To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Patrick McHardy; Pedro Garcia; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) Le mercredi 16 juin 2010 à 20:26 +0200, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :quoted
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 17:28:23 Patrick McHardy wrote:quoted
Since we don't have any special VLAN handling in the bridging code, I guess it comes down to optionally using a different ethertype value (0x88a8) in the VLAN code. We probably also need some indication from device drivers whether they are able to add these headers to avoid trying to offload tagging in case they're not.It's probably a little more than just supporting the new ethertype, but not much. The outer tag can be handled like our current VLAN module does, but the standard does not allow a regular frame to be encapsulateddirectly,quoted
but rather requires one of 1. In 802.1ad: an 802.1Q VLAN tag (ethertype 0x8100) followed by the frame 2. In 802.1ah: A service tag (ethertype 0x88e7) followed by the 802.1Q VLANtagquoted
and then the frame. Maybe what we can do is extend the vlan code to understand all three frame formats (q, ad and ah) or at least the first two so we configure both the provider VID and the Customer VID for the interface in case of 802.1ad but only the regular VID in 802.1Q. Device drivers can then flag whether they support both formats or just the regular Q tag. ArndSpeaking of device drivers, I see bnx2 (hardware accelerated) is able to insert a 8021q tag in case no vlgrp is defined (the 8201q tag that was removed by NIC)... interesting ping pong games, since our 8021q stack will remove it again, eventually. So VLAN 0 'problem' on bnx2 could be solved with following patch (avoiding this insert if vtag==0)diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c index 522de9f..b5d4d05 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bnx2.c +++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.c@@ -3192,7 +3192,7 @@ bnx2_rx_int(struct bnx2 *bp, struct bnx2_napi *bnapi,int budget) hw_vlan = 1; else #endif - { + if (vtag) { struct vlan_ethhdr *ve = (struct vlan_ethhdr *) __skb_push(skb, 4); --This way u will loose all the priority information that was on the VLAN header.
16bits vtag = 0 : there is no priority information.