Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet)

[PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Pedro Garcia <hidden> · 2010-06-13
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Ben Hutchings <hidden> · 2010-06-13
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Pedro Garcia <hidden> · 2010-06-14
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Ben Hutchings <hidden> · 2010-06-14
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Patrick McHardy <hidden> · 2010-06-14
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2010-06-14
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Pedro Garcia <hidden> · 2010-06-16
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2010-06-16
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Patrick McHardy <hidden> · 2010-06-16
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Pedro Garcia <hidden> · 2010-06-16
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2010-06-16
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2010-06-16
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Patrick McHardy <hidden> · 2010-06-16
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2010-06-16
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2010-06-16
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Vladislav Zolotarov <hidden> · 2010-06-17
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2010-06-17
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Vladislav Zolotarov <hidden> · 2010-06-17
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Pedro Garcia <hidden> · 2010-06-27
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2010-06-30
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Pedro Garcia <hidden> · 2010-07-01
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2010-07-01
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Pedro Garcia <hidden> · 2010-07-18
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2010-07-18
[BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2010-07-19
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2010-07-19
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems · "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com> · 2010-07-19
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems · Jay Vosburgh <hidden> · 2010-07-19
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems · Jay Vosburgh <hidden> · 2010-07-20
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Pedro Garcia Pelaez <hidden> · 2010-06-24
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Vladislav Zolotarov <hidden> · 2010-07-08
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Vladislav Zolotarov <hidden> · 2010-07-08
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Vladislav Zolotarov <hidden> · 2010-07-08
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> · 2010-06-14
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet) · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2010-06-14

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2010-06-14 20:03:13

Le lundi 14 juin 2010 à 12:42 -0700, Joe Perches a écrit :

On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 19:11 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

quoted

Additionally:
- the pr_debug statements may be useful for debugging, but are
  a bit excessive for the final version

Patrick, what's wrong with pr_debug?
Do you prefer pr_devel?

In the patch context, this pr_debug() is not necessary.

Just remove it, since its a normal situation, no need to log anything,
ever.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help