Re: [PATCH] SMSC LAN911x and LAN921x vendor driver
From: Bill Gatliff <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-02 16:38:55
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2008-10-21 · [PATCH] SMSC LAN911x and LAN921x vendor driver · Steve Glendinning <hidden>
- 2007-08-07 · Re: [PATCH] SMSC LAN911x and LAN921x vendor driver · Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
- 2007-08-01 · Re: [PATCH] SMSC LAN911x and LAN921x vendor driver · Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
- 2007-07-30 · Re: [PATCH] SMSC LAN911x and LAN921x vendor driver · <hidden>
- 2007-07-29 · Re: [PATCH] SMSC LAN911x and LAN921x vendor driver · Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Ben Hutchings wrote:
quoted
+static int smsc911x_phy_loopbacktest(struct smsc911x_data *pdata) +{ + int result = 0; + unsigned int i; + unsigned int val; + unsigned long flags; + + /* Initialise tx packet using broadcast destination address */ + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) + pdata->loopback_tx_pkt[i] = (char)0xFF;The cast to char is just noise.
Not sure. What about signed vs. unsigned? b.g. -- Bill Gatliff bgat@billgatliff.com