On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:19:06AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:

On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Johannes Weiner wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:08:28PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:12:18AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:56:00PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

quoted

This is where the mm_autonuma structure is being handled. Just like
sched_autonuma, this is only allocated at runtime if the hardware the
kernel is running on has been detected as NUMA. On not NUMA hardware

I think the correct wording is "non-NUMA", not "not NUMA".

That sounds far too easy to me, but I've no idea what's the right is here.

UMA?

Single-node hardware?

Lets be simple and stay with non-NUMA.

Ok, I already corrected all occurrences.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>