Re: [PATCH 13/40] autonuma: CPU follow memory algorithm

On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 14:46 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:

I am not convinced all architectures that have CONFIG_NUMA
need to be a requirement, since some of them (eg. Alpha)
seem to be lacking a maintainer nowadays. 

Still, this NUMA balancing stuff is not a small tweak to load-balancing.
Its a very significant change is how you schedule. Having such great
differences over architectures isn't something I look forward to.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>