Re: [PATCH 06/40] autonuma: x86 pte_numa() and pmd_numa()
From: Andrea Arcangeli <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-04 23:04:57
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:02:41AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 06/28/2012 08:55 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:quoted
static inline int pte_file(pte_t pte) { - return pte_flags(pte)& _PAGE_FILE; + return (pte_flags(pte)& _PAGE_FILE) == _PAGE_FILE; }Wait, why is this change made? Surely _PAGE_FILE is just one single bit and this change is not useful? If there is a reason for this change, please document it.
I splitted it off to a separated patch with proper commit log here. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/andrea/aa.git;a=commitdiff;h=7b2292c7ab86205f3d630533dc9987449fea6347 I haven't checked if it spawns the same warning without the patchset applied, but I need the build not to show warnings, so while it may be irrelevant warning for upstream, I don't like to have warnings.
quoted
static inline int pte_hidden(pte_t pte)@@ -415,7 +417,46 @@ static inline int pte_hidden(pte_t pte) static inline int pmd_present(pmd_t pmd) { - return pmd_flags(pmd)& _PAGE_PRESENT; + return pmd_flags(pmd)& (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_PROTNONE | + _PAGE_NUMA_PMD); +}Somewhat subtle. Better documentation in patch 5 will help explain this.
It's as subtle as PROTNONE but I added more explanation below as well as in patch 5.
quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_AUTONUMA +static inline int pte_numa(pte_t pte) +{ + return (pte_flags(pte)& + (_PAGE_NUMA_PTE|_PAGE_PRESENT)) == _PAGE_NUMA_PTE; +} + +static inline int pmd_numa(pmd_t pmd) +{ + return (pmd_flags(pmd)& + (_PAGE_NUMA_PMD|_PAGE_PRESENT)) == _PAGE_NUMA_PMD; +} +#endifThese could use a little explanation of how _PAGE_NUMA_* is used and what the flags mean.
Added: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/andrea/aa.git;a=commitdiff;h=0e6537227de32c40bbf0a5bc6b11d27ba5779e68
quoted
+static inline pte_t pte_mknotnuma(pte_t pte) +{ + pte = pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_NUMA_PTE); + return pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_ACCESSED); +} + +static inline pmd_t pmd_mknotnuma(pmd_t pmd) +{ + pmd = pmd_clear_flags(pmd, _PAGE_NUMA_PMD); + return pmd_set_flags(pmd, _PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_ACCESSED); +} + +static inline pte_t pte_mknuma(pte_t pte) +{ + pte = pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_NUMA_PTE); + return pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_PRESENT); +} + +static inline pmd_t pmd_mknuma(pmd_t pmd) +{ + pmd = pmd_set_flags(pmd, _PAGE_NUMA_PMD); + return pmd_clear_flags(pmd, _PAGE_PRESENT); }These functions could use some explanation, too. Why do the top ones set _PAGE_ACCESSED, while the bottom ones leave _PAGE_ACCESSED alone? I can guess the answer, but it should be documented so it is also clear to people with less experience in the VM.
Added too in prev link. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>