Re: [PATCH 13/40] autonuma: CPU follow memory algorithm

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 12:51 -0400, Dor Laor wrote:

quoted

Some developers have a thick skin and nothing gets in, others are human
and have feelings. Using a tiny difference in behavior we can do much
much better. What's works in a f2f loud discussion doesn't play well in
email.

We're all humans, we all have feelings, and I'm frigging upset.

As a maintainer I try and do my best to support and maintain the
subsystems I'm responsible for. I take this very serious.

So, would you please very seriously look into my NAK ?
It's looks very clear to me.

I don't agree with the approach Andrea takes, we all know that, yet I do
want to talk about it. The problem is, many of the crucial details are
non-obvious and no sane explanation seems forthcoming.

I really feel I'm talking to deaf ears.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a hrefmailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>