Thread (177 messages) 177 messages, 16 authors, 2012-07-14

Re: [PATCH 13/40] autonuma: CPU follow memory algorithm

From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-29 19:05:30
Also in: lkml

On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 12:51 -0400, Dor Laor wrote:
Some developers have a thick skin and nothing gets in, others are human 
and have feelings. Using a tiny difference in behavior we can do much 
much better. What's works in a f2f loud discussion doesn't play well in 
email. 
We're all humans, we all have feelings, and I'm frigging upset.

As a maintainer I try and do my best to support and maintain the
subsystems I'm responsible for. I take this very serious.

I don't agree with the approach Andrea takes, we all know that, yet I do
want to talk about it. The problem is, many of the crucial details are
non-obvious and no sane explanation seems forthcoming.

I really feel I'm talking to deaf ears.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help