On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 04:26:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 04:22:47PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 02:15:10PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 09:05:34AM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 12:34:36AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 5:17 PM Conor Dooley [off-list ref] wrote:

...

quoted

quoted

quoted

Note, please, remove extra '.' (dot) in the Subject.o

fwiw, the .. was intentional cos I was truncating the pinconf_generic
from the function since the subject was really long, not referring to
a member of an ops struct.

Yes, and that's how we refer to the callbacks — with a single dot and parentheses:

	.my_cool_cb()

Alternatively

	->my_cool_cb()

but it one character longer and TBH it slightly less readable (I personally
used the latter and then switched to the former in the recent years).

Hmm... My memory tricked me, it seems I switched to ->cb() notation, at least
there are patches with that from October last year. Whatever, choose one and
use it :-)

I think you missed my point, I was /not/ trying to refer to an ops struct
member. For those I follow the first of the two notations you listed.