Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 12 authors, 2011-12-06

[PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver

From: Dave Martin <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-06 13:25:39
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-ide, linux-next, lkml

On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:49:52AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:37:35AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
quoted
1) All OF code and drivers should be migrating to use 0 instead of NO_IRQ
   for the no-interrupt case.  Code which receives irq numbers directly
   from the OF framework and refers to NO_IRQ, or expects 0 to be a valid
   needs to be fixed.

2) Where we hit a problem, board code needs to be adapted to remap HW IRQs
   0-15 to different software values.  (This could be done using irq
   domains, or not)
No AMBA driver I'm aware of ever uses an IRQ number 0 or is passed such
an IRQ number.
OK, hopefully we can safely ignore that case, then.

But other than that, you're in agreement?

Cheers
---Dave
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help