[PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
From: geert@linux-m68k.org (Geert Uytterhoeven)
Date: 2011-12-05 18:15:50
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-ide, linux-next, lkml
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 19:02, Dave Martin [off-list ref] wrote:
Unfortunately, NO_IRQ is often not spelled "NO_IRQ". ?It looks like the assumption "irq < 0 === no irq" may be quite a lot more widespread than "NO_IRQ === no irq".
Can we make irq unsigned, and hope the compiler catches all of them
(comparison always
false blah blah blah)?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ?? -- Linus Torvalds