[PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-06 11:34:05
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-ide, linux-next, lkml
From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-06 11:34:05
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-ide, linux-next, lkml
can we sinply introduce a macro irq_is_valid
See the 2005, 2006 and 2008 discussion.
if (!dev->irq)
is the proper test.
The <= is just a temporary thing while ARM gets its publically visible
house in order so it can be done without breakage.
Alan