Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Date: 2019-03-14 16:39:25
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:41 AM Patrick Bellasi [off-list ref] wrote:
On 14-Mar 08:29, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:quoted
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:46 AM Patrick Bellasi [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 13-Mar 14:32, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:quoted
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:06 AM Patrick Bellasi [off-list ref] wrote:[...]quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
The rq::uclamp::bucket[clamp_id][] array is scanned every time we need to find a new MAX aggregated clamp value for a clamp_id. This operation is required only when we dequeue the last task of a clamp bucket tracking the current MAX aggregated clamp value. In these cases, the CPU is either entering IDLE or going to schedule a less boosted or more clamped task.The following:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
The expected number of different clamp values, configured at build time, is small enough to fit the full unordered array into a single cache line.will read: The expected number of different clamp values, configured at build time, is small enough to fit the full unordered array into a single cache line for the default UCLAMP_BUCKETS configuration of 7 buckets.
I think keeping default to be 5 is good. As you mentioned it's a nice round number and keeping it at the minimum also hints that this is not a free resource and the more buckets you use the more you pay. Documentation might say "to fit the full unordered array into a single cache line for configurations of up to 7 buckets".
[...]quoted
Got it. From reading the documentation at the beginning my impression was that whatever value I choose within allowed 5-20 range it would still fit in a cache line. To disambiguate it might be worse mentioning that this is true for the default value or for values up to 7. Thanks!Right, I hope the above proposed change helps to clarify that. -- #include <best/regards.h> Patrick Bellasi