Hi,
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Jeff King wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:37:42AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
quoted
1. You could loosen (1) above by assuming that --no-defaults will
never appears as the argument to an option, and therefore any time
you find it, it should be respected. Thus your first parse is just
a simple loop looking for the option.
I go with 1)
This feels very hack-ish to me, but perhaps this is a case of "perfect
is the enemy of the good".
I have a strong feeling that none of our diff/rev options can sanely take
a parameter looking like "--defaults" or "--no-defaults".
But I do not have the time to audit the options. Maybe you have?
Ciao,
Dscho